stupid lawsuit archive | lawyer jokes | biggets lawsuit ever | link to | contact

Frivolous lawsuit

Lawyer jokes
Biggest lawsuit ever

Top 10 lawsuits
A surfer sued another surfer
Turned gay after rear-end collision
Guide-dog school
An idiot sued Michael Jordan
Inmate sues himself
Drunken driver lawsuit
Suing Wendy's for finding finger in chili
Exepensive sperm
Coca-Cola vending machine
More stupid lawsuits..


Arbeidsrett advokat i oslo

Frivolous lawsuit

In courts, a lawsuit or legal argument is termed frivolous if it is filed in spite of the fact that both the plaintiff and his lawyer knew that it had no merit and it did not argue for a reasonable extension or reinterpretation of the law or no underlying justification in fact based upon the lawyer's due diligence investigation of the case before filing (e.g., the well known U.S. Federal Rule 11). Jurisdictions differ on whether a claim can be frivolous if the attorney acted in good faith. Because a frivolous filing wastes the court's and the other parties' time, resources and legal fees, it may result in sanctions being levied by the court upon the party or the lawyer who brings the action.

Lawyer Daniel B. Evans writes:

[W]hen a judge calls an argument "ridiculous" or "frivolous," it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the case has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone's time. It doesn't mean that the case wasn't well argued, or that judge simply decided for the other side, it means that there was no other side. The argument was absolutely, positively, incompetent. The judge is not telling you that you that you were "wrong." The judge is telling you that you are out of your mind.

Litigants who represent themselves (in forma pauperis and pro se) often make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure. The particular tendency of prisoners to bring baseless lawsuits led Congress to pass and Bill Clinton to sign the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which strictly limits the ability of prisoners to bring actions.

The more common use of the term "frivolous" in political discourse refers to lawsuits that are based on a theory that seems absurd, where there is no link between the conduct of the defendant and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, or where the claim or result in damages greatly exceed what one would expect from a brief summary of the case. Awards for medical malpractice are also frequently derided as frivolous. In these cases a jury and a judge decided in favor of the plaintiff; the plaintiff's claim was therefore technically not frivolous, though it might be considered frivolous colloquially. Because of the ambiguity in the term, calling these lawsuits "frivolous" can lead to confusion because opposite sides of the tort reform debate can both say they oppose "frivolous" suits, with the tort reform supporters referring to the colloquial understanding, and tort reform opponents referring to the narrower technical definition.


Share on Facebook
Contact | Link to us